Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey escalated his criticism of the Supreme Court on Saturday, accusing the judiciary of inciting a “religious war” in India. He argued that under Article 368 of the Constitution, only Parliament has the power to make laws, while the role of the Supreme Court is confined to interpreting those laws.
“Article 368 clearly states that only Parliament can create laws, while the Supreme Court’s responsibility is limited to interpreting them. However, the court is now suggesting that the President and Governor should make decisions within three months,” Dubey told ANI.
Dubey also emphasized India’s rich heritage rooted in the traditions of Lord Ram, Krishna, Sita, Radha, the 12 Jyotirlingas, and the 51 Shakti Peeths, which he believes have been integral to the nation’s culture for thousands of years.
Referring to ongoing religious disputes, such as the Ram temple, Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura, and the Gyanvapi Mosque, the BJP MP pointed out what he saw as a double standard in the court’s approach. “When it comes to the Ram temple, the court demands documents; the same goes for the Krishna Janmabhoomi and the Gyanvapi Mosque. But when discussing mosques built after the Mughal period, the court claims there are no documents to present,” he said, suggesting inconsistency in the judicial handling of religious issues.
Dubey’s comments highlight concerns about the Supreme Court’s involvement in delicate religious matters and its potential social repercussions in a country marked by complex religious dynamics.
